Fog cleared months ago when governments investigated the database handling of Blizzard and many other big companies that do jobs with China but still people have right to know what they’re signing up for… Back then right questions never asked, true but that doesn’t mean we get to skip it too. Lastly, we don’t know which company gets to hold the rights of servers, player databases or even further development and polishing. Those people are not working on Diablo Immortal instead working on Diablo IV, this is mostly made by another company supervised by Blizzard.
Additionally, we have no idea if market could be manipulated by offline exploits due to flimsy nature of smart phones, if this gonna be the next best thing to deserve its own reveal announcement then it better be sturdy enough to be free of exploits. Diablo Immortal is mostly outsourced that means it doesnt take away resources that could be used in production of Diablo IV (or whatever next full fledged game will be called). Damning evidence has already been posted and discussed at length in the links in this thread and others. With many Nintendo Switches and D3’s success on it, it’s hard to think otherwise. Not many are denying a reskin - maybe you and Blizzard. There’s no promises of emulation working for D:I if it does, it will be a success for sure but we have no idea about performance or compatibility. Questions about these three hardly answered back then, also audience was expecting a PC or console title as the main reveal, not a watered down UI phone game.
There are so many questions about emulation, data base handling and the DRM’s impact for free market.
0 kommentar(er)
